<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SprayShield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sprayshield.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sprayshield.org</link>
	<description>Informations about adhesions barriers and SprayShield Adhesion barrier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Adhesions! Doctors: Bound by Secrecy? Victims: Bound by Pain!</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/news/adhesions-doctors-bound-by-secrecy-victims-bound-by-pain-2/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/news/adhesions-doctors-bound-by-secrecy-victims-bound-by-pain-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book on adhesions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bound By Secrecy? Victims: Bound By Pain! is a triumphant and heartrending story, told with a sense of humor and wit, of a mother trying to find hope and healing for her beloved daughter. It is an inspiring story of perseverance-against all medical odds-and the final triumph over an horrible illness. The writing of Melissa's trying journey opens the windows of knowledge and ressource to adhesion related disorder, (ARD), forever unmasking this prevalent, yet medically hushed condition.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><span style="line-height: normal; font-family: verdana; color: rgb(255,0,0)"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">Bound By Secrecy? Victims: Bound By Pain!</span></span></span><span style="line-height: normal; font-family: verdana"> is a triumphant and heartrending story, told with a sense of humor and wit, of a mother trying to find hope and healing for her <span style="color: rgb(153,51,0)">beloved daughter.</span> It is an inspiring story of perseverance-against all medical odds-and the final triumph over an horrible illness. The writing of Melissa&#39;s trying journey opens the windows of knowledge and ressource to adhesion related disorder, (ARD), forever unmasking this prevalent, yet medically hushed condition.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><span style="line-height: normal; font-family: verdana"><a href="http://www.adhesionssurgery.com/en/portal-endogyn/portal-endogyn-special/adhesions/patients-information/patients-information/patients-opinion/karen-stewards-book.html" target="_blank"><img alt="Adhesions-book02" height="587" src="http://www.endogyn-wiki.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Adhesions-book02.jpg" title="Adhesions-book02" width="400" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/news/adhesions-doctors-bound-by-secrecy-victims-bound-by-pain-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adhesions reform after surgery!</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/adhesions-formation/adhesions-reform-after-surgery-2/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/adhesions-formation/adhesions-reform-after-surgery-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adhesions formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions after surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adhesions reformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions related disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surgery without any effects...
and which could be very dangerous, especially in adhesions surgery cases!

The next some images show why a surgery without adequate adhesion barriers doesn't work and therefore is absolute

unnecessary, without any effect and can be dangerous.

 

This patient has adhesions between sigma / left pelvic wall / uterus / ovar
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 class="csc-firstHeader" style="text-align: left">Surgery without any effects&#8230;</h1>
<div class="csc-textpic-text">
<p class="align-center">and which could be very dangerous, especially in adhesions surgery cases!</p>
<p class="align-center">The next some images show why a surgery without adequate adhesion barriers doesn&#39;t work and therefore is absolute</p>
<p class="align-center">unnecessary, without any effect and can be dangerous.</p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="align-center">This patient has adhesions between sigma / left pelvic wall / uterus / ovary</p>
<p class="align-center"><a href="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example1a.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-86" height="231" src="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example1a-300x231.jpg" title="Example1a" width="300" /></a></p>
<p class="align-center"><a href="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example2a.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-87" height="231" src="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example2a-300x231.jpg" title="Example2a" width="300" /></a></p>
<p class="align-center">After 4 hours of surgery all organs could be isolated and the anatomical result is excellent:</p>
<p class="align-center">e<a href="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example3a.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-91" height="231" src="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example3a-300x231.jpg" title="Example3a" width="300" /></a></p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="align-center">We didn&#39;t apply SprayGel as there was a small lesion of the serosa of the bowel which was sutured. We didn&#39;t use SprayGel in the same procedure due to increasing infection potential in case of suture insufficiency.</p>
<p class="align-center">In such cases we perform a second-look around 4 &#8211; 5 days later to check if the bowel is ok and apply than SprayShield / SprayGel.</p>
<p class="align-center">So this is how it looks only 4 days later after an ecellent adhesiolysis !!!</p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example4a1.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-90" height="231" src="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example4a1-300x231.jpg" title="Example4a" width="300" /></a></p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="align-center"><b>In this and some other cases we didn&#39;t apply SprayGel in the first procedure, so we could see what is the reality: an adhesiolysis without any adhesion barrier doesn&#39;t work !!!</b></p>
<p class="align-center"><a href="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example5a.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-92" height="231" src="http://www.adhesions.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Example5a-300x231.jpg" title="Example5a" width="300" /></a></p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p class="align-center"><b>All the adhesions reformed and even got more severe and worse&#8230;</b></p>
<p class="align-center"><b>And if the patients had not been in OUR adhesiolysis concept&#8230;</b></p>
<p class="align-center"><b>All that work had been for nothing and with high risk and complication possibilities for the patients&#8230;</b></p>
<p class="align-center">Due to the early second-look in cases of bowel injuries, the adhesions are only attached and can be taken down simply by touching with an instrument and some aqua dissection without any bleeding:</p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.adhesions.de/db/img/MessageBoard/Example6a.jpg" /></p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="align-center">So in OUR concept of adhesion surgery, it is possible in the secon look procedure to check the bowel (it was intact in this case) and to apply SprayShield, that will for sure prevent adhesion reformation.</p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.adhesions.de/db/img/MessageBoard/Example7a.jpg" /></p>
<p class="align-center">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="align-center"><b>Without SprayShiel and without a SECOND-LOOK procedure it would be a real unnecessary and dangerous surgery !</b></p>
<p class="align-center"><b>Please be aware of surgery without adequate tools, adhesion barriers (SprayShield) and without a second-look, performed by so called &quot;specialists&quot; with NO concept and infrastructure as suddenly all surgeons are adhesions surgery specialists!</b></p>
<p>		<b>Avoid also a LAPAROTOMY and if possible a laparoscopy with GAS </b></p>
<p class="align-center"><b>&nbsp;</b></p>
<p class="align-center"><a href="http://www.adhesionssurgery.com/en/portal-endogyn/portal-endogyn-special/adhesions/patients-information/patients-information/what-to-avoid/chirurgie-die-nichts-bringt.html"><b>(see all the information at this website)</b></a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/adhesions-formation/adhesions-reform-after-surgery-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adhesions surgery in Germany?</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/adhesions-surgery-in-germany-2/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/adhesions-surgery-in-germany-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SprayShield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adhesion surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions after surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adhesions surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why to have Adhesion surgery in Germany ?
Prepared by Roselyn Macdonald, roselyn99@hotmail.com, after having surgery with Dr Kruschinski in late October, 2004.

As you read this information, there are three big advantages that Dr Kruschinski offers any adhesions patient, and which to my knowledge nobody else can, or will, offer. These are precisely and exactly WHY you SHOULD go to Dr K for your surgery and why it is very likely not only to get rid of your pain(s) but also to be the last surgery you’ll ever need for adhesions. As a patient myself who has had 18 years of adhesions and some 5 laparotomies (bad cut from the belly button straight down all the way each time) and some 4 or so laparoscopies with gas, I can tell you this truly. Your post operative pain will be nothing at all like previous surgeries because the spray gel keeps all cut surfaces sliding happily past each other. No ripping and tearing pain such as I had previously thought was ordinary and common (which of course it is for any of you who have not had Dr K’s wonderful work done on you). 

The hospital where you will have the surgery and initial recovery stay is a first class hosp
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><b>Why to have Adhesion surgery in Germany ?</b></h1>
<p class="bodytext"><b>Prepared by Roselyn Macdonald, <a href="mailto:roselyn99@hotmail.com">roselyn99@hotmail.com</a>, after having surgery with Dr Kruschinski in late October, 2004.</b></p>
<p>	As you read this information, there are three big advantages that Dr Kruschinski offers any adhesions patient, and which to my knowledge nobody else can, or will, offer. These are precisely and exactly WHY you SHOULD go to Dr K for your surgery and why it is very likely not only to get rid of your pain(s) but also to be the last surgery you&rsquo;ll ever need for adhesions. As a patient myself who has had 18 years of adhesions and some 5 laparotomies (bad cut from the belly button straight down all the way each time) and some 4 or so laparoscopies with gas, I can tell you this truly. Your post operative pain will be nothing at all like previous surgeries because the spray gel keeps all cut surfaces sliding happily past each other. No ripping and tearing pain such as I had previously thought was ordinary and common (which of course it is for any of you who have not had Dr K&rsquo;s wonderful work done on you). </p>
<p>	The hospital&nbsp;where you will have the surgery and initial recovery stay is a first class hospital with&nbsp;2 beds or 1 beds&nbsp;per room and is very modern, clean and nicely appointed. The standard of nursing care is very very high. The hospital&nbsp;has an excellent patient-care status &#8211; as well as a private post-operative recovery room for one-on-one care. There are cultural differences to be sure; but nothing that will prevent the patient from receiving high quality care &#8211; nor from enjoying their stay! Most of the nurses speak English very well! There were just a few words we had problems with &#8211; but not many. I had no problem understanding them! They were all very sweet and helpful.</p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"><span style="font-weight: bold">Roselyn Macdonald&#39;s view on gasless surgery:</span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<p class="bodytext"><b>Advantages of using the gasless laparoscopy with a particular emphasis on how it offers the first real hope to adhesions patients:</b></p>
</div>
<ol>
<li><b>Cost effective</b>
<ol type="a">
<li>No expensive CO2 gas</li>
<li>SprayGel / SprayShield&nbsp;greatly reduces length of hospital stay for surgical patients, see 5a.</li>
<li>Ditto b. for less outpatient follow-up and very much less chance of needing repeat adhesion surgery in future years, see 5 b.</li>
<li>Significantly less specialized training of surgeons as technique in gas-less laparoscopy is largely the same as in ordinary open laparotomy, see 2 a.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>Uses normal</b>
<ol type="a">
<li>Already familiar instruments</li>
<li>More direct hand contact with operative surfaces than in the old laparoscopy with gas</li>
<li>Easy changing of instruments without loss of gas</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>No CO2 damage to cells</b>
<ol type="a">
<li>No risk of hypoxemia, acidosis. Global acidosis or global necrosis on the cells of the peritoneum</li>
<li>Therefore MUCH less risk of adhesions from any of the items in &ldquo;a&rdquo; above, and Much less risk of adhesions even just from the CO2 alone</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>Ability to use local anaesthesia</b></li>
<li><b>Absolutely no blind puncture injuries</b>
<ol type="a">
<li>All work is done directly under vision</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>SprayGel / SprayShield&nbsp;keeps all surfaces slippery</b>
<ol type="a">
<li>Greatly reduces post operative pain, patient requires less pain medication, feels better sooner and consequently has a much shorter hospital stay (in my case a difference of 2 nights instead of an average of 10 nights)</li>
<li>Dramatically reduces if not eliminates re-formation of adhesions</li>
<li>Less adhesions or no adhesions means a significant chance of no further surgery</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;<b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: 10pt">It is </span></b><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: 11.5pt">vitally important</span></b><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: 10pt"> to understand that:</span></b></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color: black"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt">The gas-less laparoscopy uses a machine called the Abdo-lift which is carefully calibrated to lift the abdominal wall to an acceptable level of pressure which does not damage muscles, nerves and tissue. It is the Abdo-lift which gives a clear view of the surgical field thus cancelling the need for the harmful CO2 gas. </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color: black"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt">The SprayGel / SprayShield <b>is only properly effective when used in conjunction with the gasless laparoscopy</b>. This is because the SprayGel / SprayShield is a fine jet of spray which will be blown about by the high pressure CO2 gas and will thus merely spot the cut surgical surfaces of the patient haphazardly here and there, rather than giving a dense even blanket coverage. This dense blanket coverage is vital for the spray-gel to keep ALL of the cut surgical surfaces of the patient from sticking together whilst healing and thus creating more adhesions. </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color: black"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt">Furthermore the cold CO2 gas naturally causes cells to constrict and thus prevents the SprayGel / SprayShield from infiltrating the tissues properly. This also prevents the spray-gel from doing it&rsquo;s job effectively. </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color: black"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt">It is also, of course, vital that good surgical techniques are used throughout, especially in the fight to prevent adhesions.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: 10pt"><br />
	This document was prepared by Roselyn Macdonald who is not a medical person at all, but a patient with an 18 year history of adhesions starting in the first instance with endometriosis. She has had a large number of very skilfully and excellently performed laparoscopy&rsquo;s and laparotomy&rsquo;s over the 18 years with the overriding problem always being adhesions with partial bowel obstructions necessitating many hospital stays. She whole heartedly endorses the pioneering work of Dr. Daniel Kruschinski in Germany, who is the first person in all of the long 18 years who is not only willing, but eager to operate on cases like myself who are almost certainly going to be difficult and time consuming. The reason he does not run away from adhesions? Hopefully obvious to you from reading the above, he really does have the answer. I am happy to speak to anyone medical, patient or just curious. <br />
	My phone number is +44&nbsp;1202 545 614. </p>
<p>
	</span><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: 11.5pt">Don&#39;t forget</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: 10pt">, gasless laparoscopy and SprayGel / SprayShield work <b>together</b></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/adhesions-surgery-in-germany-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different types of adjuvants used to prevent adhesions?</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/adhesionsbarriers/different-types-of-adjuvants-used-to-prevent-adhesions/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/adhesionsbarriers/different-types-of-adjuvants-used-to-prevent-adhesions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 06:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adhesionsbarriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adhesion formation and reformation are still an unavoidable event in reproductive pelvic surgery in spite of the variable skills in microsurgery and endoscopic surgery. 

This fact necessitates the search for barrier that can be used in the perioperative period. 

There have various barriers or adjuvants that have been used but none have conclusively proven to be effective in various studies. 

CLASSES OF ADHESION-REDUCTION ADJUVANTS AND THEIR PROPOSED MECHANISM OF ACTION
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-size: medium; ">Adhesion formation and reformation are still an unavoidable event in reproductive pelvic surgery in spite of the variable skills in microsurgery and endoscopic surgery.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p class="bodytext" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 10pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-size: medium; "><br />
	This fact necessitates the search for barrier that can be used in the perioperative period.&nbsp;</p>
<p>	There have various barriers or adjuvants that have been used but none have conclusively proven to be effective in various studies.&nbsp;</p>
<p>	<font color="#008000"><strong>CLASSES OF ADHESION-REDUCTION ADJUVANTS AND THEIR PROPOSED MECHANISM OF ACTION</strong></font><br />
	</span></p>
<p class="bodytext" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 10pt; ">&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-size: medium; "></p>
<p>	I.&nbsp;<font color="#008000"><strong>Fibrinolytic agents</strong></font>&nbsp;(fibrinolysis, stimulation of plasminogen activators)&nbsp;<br />
	Fibrinolysin&nbsp;<br />
	Streptokinase&nbsp;<br />
	Urokinase&nbsp;<br />
	Hyaluronidase&nbsp;<br />
	Chymotrypsin&nbsp;<br />
	Trypsin&nbsp;<br />
	Pepsin&nbsp;<br />
	Plasminogen activators&nbsp;</p>
<p>	II.&nbsp;<font color="#008000"><strong>Anticoagulants</strong></font>&nbsp;(prevention of clot and fibrin formation)&nbsp;<br />
	Heparin&nbsp;<br />
	Citrates&nbsp;<br />
	Oxalates&nbsp;</p>
<p>	III.&nbsp;<font color="#008000"><strong>Anti-inflammatory Agents</strong></font>&nbsp;(reduce vascular permeability, reduce histamine release and, stabilize lysozomes)&nbsp;</p>
<p>	Corticosteroids&nbsp;<br />
	Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents&nbsp;<br />
	Anti-histamines&nbsp;<br />
	Progesterone&nbsp;<br />
	Calcium channel blockers&nbsp;<br />
	Colchicine&nbsp;</p>
<p>	VI.&nbsp;<font color="#008000"><strong>Antibiotics</strong></font>&nbsp;(prevent infection)&nbsp;<br />
	Tetracyclines&nbsp;<br />
	Cephalosporins&nbsp;</p>
<p>	V.&nbsp;<font color="#008000"><strong>Mechanical Separation</strong></font>&nbsp;(surface separation, hydroflotation)&nbsp;</p>
<p>	A. Intra-abdominal Instillates:&nbsp;<br />
	Dextran&nbsp;<br />
	Mineral oil&nbsp;<br />
	Silicone&nbsp;<br />
	Vaseline&nbsp;<br />
	Crystalloid solutions&nbsp;<br />
	Carboxymethylcellulose&nbsp;<br />
	Hyaluronic acid&nbsp;<br />
	Chelated hyaluronic acid&nbsp;<br />
	Poloxamer&nbsp;</p>
<p>	B. Barriers:&nbsp;<br />
	Endogenous tissues:&nbsp;<br />
	Omental grafts&nbsp;<br />
	Peritoneal grafts&nbsp;<br />
	Bladder strips&nbsp;<br />
	Fetal membranes&nbsp;<br />
	Exogenous materials:&nbsp;<br />
	Fibrin glue&nbsp;<br />
	Polytetrafluoroethylene&nbsp;<br />
	Oxidized cellulose&nbsp;<br />
	Oxidized regenerated cellulose&nbsp;<br />
	Gelatin&nbsp;<br />
	Rubber sheets&nbsp;<br />
	Metal foils&nbsp;<br />
	Plastic hoods&nbsp;</p>
<p>	</span></p>
<hr />
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-size: medium; "></p>
<p>	Modified from Diamond MP, DeCherney AH: Pathogenesis of adhesion formation/reformation: Application to reproductive pelvic surgery. Microsurgery 1987: 8: 103 and Diamond MP, Hershlag A: Adhesion formation/reformation: in Treatment of postsurgical Adhesions, Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1990: 23-33.&nbsp;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/adhesionsbarriers/different-types-of-adjuvants-used-to-prevent-adhesions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the principle how barriers prevent adhesions?</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/adhesionsbarriers/what-is-the-principle-how-barriers-prevent-adhesions/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/adhesionsbarriers/what-is-the-principle-how-barriers-prevent-adhesions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 07:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adhesionsbarriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adhesions are formed after all surgical measures involving laparotomy.  But even during laparoscopy, which is a form of minimally invasive surgery, wound surfaces can be formed during certain procedures, such as for example endometriosis or myoma operations. These surfaces can adhere to each other, thus forming adhesions. These adhesions can later cause problems such as pain, adhesion of the uterine tubes (infertility) or of other organs (intestines / ovaries / uterus). They thus have the potential to cause chronic problems and pain requiring tedious treatment measures, and possibly even adhesiolysis, a follow-up surgical procedure to remove these adhesions. The long-term success of many different surgical procedures can be improved by the use of barriers that act as “internal bandages” and prevent adhesions Many of the available mechanical barriers in use today are derived from either industrial materials or animal sources. SprayShield™ (formerly SprayGel™) is a new barrier substance from Covidien to prevent postsurgical adhesions. SprayShield™, a largely water based tissue friend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adhesions are formed after all surgical measures involving laparotomy.&nbsp; But even during laparoscopy, which is a form of minimally invasive surgery, wound surfaces can be formed during certain procedures, such as for example endometriosis or myoma operations. These surfaces can adhere to each other, thus forming adhesions. These adhesions can later cause problems such as pain, adhesion of the uterine tubes (infertility) or of other organs (intestines / ovaries / uterus). They thus have the potential to cause chronic problems and pain requiring tedious treatment measures, and possibly even adhesiolysis, a follow-up surgical procedure to remove these adhesions. The long-term success of many different surgical procedures can be improved by the use of barriers that act as &ldquo;internal bandages&rdquo; and prevent adhesions Many of the available mechanical barriers in use today are derived from either industrial materials or animal sources.&nbsp;<strong>SprayShield&trade; (formerly&nbsp;SprayGel&trade;)&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: normal; "><strong>is a new barrier substance from Covidien&nbsp;to prevent postsurgical adhesions.</strong></span></strong>&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;</span>, a largely water based tissue friendly material, fills the need for an effective, safe, easy-to-use system for successful postoperative adhesion prevention.&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;&nbsp;</span>is a smooth, water based, coating material also known as a hydrogel. This material is formed from two water based polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions that mix at the site of the injury. The solutions are sprayed using an applicator that is designed for minimally invasive surgical instrumentation.</p>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(34, 34, 34); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
<div><img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/specialtreat/adhesions/adhes15.1.jpg" style="cursor: default; " /><span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;&nbsp;</span>is&nbsp;for Laparascopic Surgery.</div>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;</span>&nbsp;is prepared and applied to the surgical site through the SprayShield Laparaoscopic Sprayer through a 5mm trocar. The SprayShield Laparoscopic Sprayer, a single-use, disposable, has a unique venting capability for safety and a flexible tip for greater control. The SprayShield&nbsp;Laparascopic Sprayer is attached to the SprayShield&nbsp;Air Pump, which is a reusable, self-contained air pump. During an operation a surgeon sprays&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;</span>&nbsp;onto the internal surfaces most at risk for adhesions.</p>
<div><img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/specialtreat/adhesions/adhes15.2.jpg" style="cursor: default; " /></div>
<p>&nbsp; This coats and protects the tissues likely to form adhesions. After the internal wounds are healed, the coating breaks apart and is naturally cleared from the body in the urine. The material is very inert and highly compatible in the body. Since no human or animal based products are used in&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;</span>, the potential risk to the patient is reduced.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adhesionssurgery.com/en/portal-endogyn/endogyn/special-treatment/adhesions/about-adhesions/sprayshield-adhesion-prevention.html" target="_blank">FOR MORE DETAILS ON SPRAYSHIELD PLEASE&nbsp;VISIT:</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/adhesionsbarriers/what-is-the-principle-how-barriers-prevent-adhesions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SprayShield Application broshure</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield-application-broshure/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield-application-broshure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SprayShield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprayshield adhesion barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SprayShield adhesions barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SprayShield application broshure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A broshure on SprayShield application can be opened and downloaded. Please click on the picture below:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(34, 34, 34); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
<p style="text-align: center; ">A broshure on SprayShield application can be opened and downloaded.</p>
<p style="text-align: center; ">Please click on the picture below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/specialtreat/adhesions/sprayshieldbroshure.pdf" target="_blank"><img alt="sprayshieldbroshure1" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-103" height="300" src="http://www.sprayshield.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/sprayshieldbroshure1-267x300.jpg" style="cursor: default; " title="sprayshieldbroshure1" width="267" /></a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield-application-broshure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SprayShield versus Spraygel</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield-versus-spraygel/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield-versus-spraygel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SprayShield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprayshield adhesion barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SprayShield adhesions barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprayshield versus spraygel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SprayGel™ was modified in some parts, so the resorption was promised to be shorter (5-7 days) than it was with SprayGel™(7-14 days). And the blue colour is not due to methylenblue anymore but a simple colour used frequently in food = Brilliant Blue FCF; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Blue_FCF. For clinical comparison here you can see an image with similar adhesions after adhesiolysis and covered with the SprayGel™ and 7 days later in the 2nd look laparoscopy. One can see that the SprayGel™ is still there and a little tissue reaction (reddish areas with neovascularisation) is shown:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SprayGel&trade; was modified in some parts, so the resorption was promised to be shorter (5-7 days) than it was with SprayGel&trade;(7-14 days). And the blue colour is not due to methylenblue anymore but a simple colour used frequently in food = Brilliant Blue FCF;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Blue_FCF?session=GE65wDP2BhF2XvAGBsewo1dCvQ" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Blue_FCF</a>. For clinical comparison here you can see an image with similar adhesions after adhesiolysis and covered with the SprayGel&trade; and 7 days later in the 2nd look laparoscopy. One can see that the SprayGel&trade; is still there and a little tissue reaction (reddish areas with neovascularisation) is shown:</p>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(34, 34, 34); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
<p><img alt="" height="185" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/20070813fA.jpg" style="cursor: default; " width="262" />&nbsp;<img alt="" height="185" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/20070813gA.jpg" style="cursor: default; " width="247" /></p>
<p>And again for comparison again with SprayShield&trade;, where after only 5 days, SprayShield&trade; is fully absorbed and the peritoneum is smooth without any reaction:</p>
<p><img alt="" height="190" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield03A.JPG" style="cursor: default; " width="269" />&nbsp;<img alt="" height="188" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield04A.JPG" style="cursor: default; " width="248" /></p>
<p>Actually there seems to be a better and rapid resorption of the Hydrogel. Performing now&nbsp;many 2nd-looks on day 5th after initial surgery, we are confident, that SprayShield&trade; has a an excellent&nbsp;potential and covers the surgical field for around 5-7 days, wich is exactly the time, adhesions reformation might&nbsp;happen. Due the fact that the resorption is very short, SprayShield&trade; has a relatively mild forein body reaction, comparing to SprayGel&trade;. We will continue research and if that is the case, we might decrease the time between Surgery and 2nd look laparoscopy to five days, so the time necessary to stay at the hospital will be shorter. Also the possibility of&nbsp;complications in regard to infections might decrease with the new product.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield-versus-spraygel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SprayShield™ &#8211; new adhesions barrier to prevent adhesions formation after surgical procedures</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield%e2%84%a2-new-adhesions-barrier-to-prevent-adhesions-formation-after-surgical-procedures/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield%e2%84%a2-new-adhesions-barrier-to-prevent-adhesions-formation-after-surgical-procedures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SprayShield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprayshield adhesion barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SprayShield adhesions barrier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since March 2001 we have been using this novel spray substance SprayShield™, (formerly SprayGel) to prevent adhesions following gynaecological surgical procedures.  In general, adhesions are formed after all surgical measures involving laparotomy. But even during laparoscopy, which is a form of minimally invasive surgery, wound surfaces can be formed during certain procedures, such as for example endometriosis or myoma operations. These surfaces can adhere to each other, thus forming adhesions. These adhesions can later cause problems such as pain, adhesion of the uterine tubes (infertility) or of other organs (intestines / ovaries / uterus). They thus have the potential to cause chronic problems and pain requiring tedious treatment measures, and possibly even adhesiolysis, a follow-up surgical procedure to remove these adhesions. The new gel substance (SprayShield™) is sprayed onto the wound surfaces, where it remains in place for some days after surgery. Since adhesions ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since March 2001 we have been using this novel spray substance&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;,&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: normal; ">(formerly SprayGel) to prevent adhesions following gynaecological surgical procedures.&nbsp;</span></span>&nbsp;In general, adhesions are formed after all surgical measures involving laparotomy. But even during laparoscopy, which is a form of minimally invasive surgery, wound surfaces can be formed during certain procedures, such as for example endometriosis or myoma operations. These surfaces can adhere to each other, thus forming adhesions. These adhesions can later cause problems such as pain, adhesion of the uterine tubes (infertility) or of other organs (intestines / ovaries / uterus). They thus have the potential to cause chronic problems and pain requiring tedious treatment measures, and possibly even adhesiolysis, a follow-up surgical procedure to remove these adhesions. The new gel substance (<strong>SprayShield&trade;</strong>) is sprayed onto the wound surfaces, where it remains in place for some days after surgery. Since adhesions are formed within 7 days of surgery, the barrier system thus prevents formation of adhesions. After this period, SprayShield&trade; is then broken down and simply absorbed by the peritoneum and excreted from the body via the kidneys. The carbon dioxide customarily used to insufflate the abdomen during laparoscopy converts the entire peritoneum into an acidic environment. This thus results in oxygen being withdrawn from the tissues and can cause cells to die, with formation of global wound surfaces in the peritoneum and abdominal organs By using gasless laparoscopy, we avoid insufflation with carbon dioxide, which has been shown by recent studies &mdash; for the aforementioned reasons &mdash; to be a co-factor adhesion formation. But since wound surfaces are always formed during surgery because of tissue layers being separated, the formation of adhesions can additionally be prevented on such surfaces by spraying them with SprayShield&trade;. Hence in the gasless laparoscopy technique and SprayShield&trade; we have an ideal combination that helps to prevent the occurrence and formation of adhesions.&nbsp;<span style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0); "><strong>Dr Kruschinski</strong></span>&nbsp;has now performed adhesiolysis on around&nbsp;<span style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0); "><strong>500</strong></span>&nbsp;cases using the technique of gasless adhesiolysis with spray gel application Adhesions are known to form as soon as three hours after the completion of a surgical procedure &#8211; and will continue to form for up to about seven days. If any adhesions have formed during this critical time period, they can easily be &quot;swept down&quot; by the surgeon during a second look laparoscopy &#8211; and more SprayShield&nbsp;can be applied, if needed. Dr. Daniel Kruschinski is one of the very few surgeons in the world, who performs a second look laparoscopy (SLL) about seven days after the initial surgical procedure. In Dr. Kruschinski&#39;s experience the risk of adhesions resulting in the need for a subsequent surgery is greatly reduced. He has mastered the required advanced microsurgical laparoscopic techniques and has logged thousands of hours in performing very difficult, time-consuming, risky surgical procedures. Repeat surgery for adhesions in these cases is usually less extensive and does not usually involve the same amount of dissection that led to the formation of adhesions in the first place &nbsp; Here are some of Dr Kruschinski&rsquo;s results in general &nbsp;About&nbsp;<span style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0); "><strong>89,9 % are adhesion free</strong></span>&nbsp;at the 2nd laparoscopy at 7 days postoperative.&nbsp;</p>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(34, 34, 34); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
<ul>
<li>In those patients who have small adhesion attachments to the surgery sites at the second look laparoscopy 7 days post-operatively, these attachments are removed very easily by simply touching them with an instrument.</li>
<li><span style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0); "><strong>Only 10%</strong></span>&nbsp;developed pain after surgery and had a third look laparoscopy in which adhesions were seen to be the cause of pain, the scores were reduced when compared to the initial surgery, especially in grade and severity. In other cases there were other reasons fo pain like adnexal tumour etc</li>
<li>Thus the&nbsp;<span style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0); "><strong>success rate</strong></span>&nbsp;of the gasless adhesiolysis with spray gel in patients being adhesion and pain free is about&nbsp;<span style="color: rgb(0, 128, 0); "><strong>90%</strong></span>.</li>
</ul>
<p>For Photos of Our Technique of Gasless Adhesiolysis with&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayShield&trade;</span>and&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">SprayGel&trade;</span>&nbsp;please click on the links below And for&nbsp;images with&nbsp;SprayGel&trade; and&nbsp;SprayShield&trade; in our Endoscopy&nbsp;Atlas&nbsp;<a href="http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&amp;sprache=en&amp;a=Atlas&amp;ata=OperationenbeiVerwachsungen&amp;atb=AusgepraegteDarmVerwachsungen" target="_blank">Severe bowel adhaesions</a>&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&amp;sprache=en&amp;a=Atlas&amp;ata=OperationenbeiVerwachsungen&amp;atb=SchwersteDarmVerwachsungen" target="_blank">Extremely severe bowel adhesions</a>&nbsp;Since December 2008 we are using the new SprayShield&trade; by COVIDIEN.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.adhesionssurgery.com/en/portal-endogyn/endogyn/special-treatment/adhesions/about-adhesions/our-treatment-strategy.html" target="_blank">Read more</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/sprayshield/sprayshield%e2%84%a2-new-adhesions-barrier-to-prevent-adhesions-formation-after-surgical-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extreme adhesions situs</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/clinical-results/extreme-adhesions-situs/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/clinical-results/extreme-adhesions-situs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[clinical results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprayshield adhesion barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SprayShield adhesions barrier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lift-Laparoscopy in combination with SprayGel have good results even in the worst cases,  where nearly all abdomen is covered with adhesions and the bowel adheres with his wall to the abdominal peritoneum.   Adhesions dissection is very dangerous:    as bowel might be injured and has to be sutured:   Application of SprayGel as adhesions barrier:        and at the second look laparoscopy:  bowel healed excellent, the sutures close sufficient, no infection or reformation of adhesions:     ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lift-Laparoscopy in combination with&nbsp;SprayGel have good results even in the worst cases, &nbsp;where nearly all abdomen is covered with adhesions and the bowel adheres with his wall to the abdominal peritoneum.&nbsp; &nbsp;Adhesions&nbsp;dissection is very dangerous:&nbsp; &nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/messageboard/20030928b.jpg" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;<strong>as bowel might be injured and has to be sutured:</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/messageboard/20030928c.jpg" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;Application of&nbsp;SprayGel as adhesions barrier: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/messageboard/20030928d.jpg" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;and at the second look laparoscopy: &nbsp;bowel healed excellent, the sutures close&nbsp;sufficient, no infection or reformation&nbsp;of adhesions: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/messageboard/20030928e.jpg" style="cursor: default; " /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/clinical-results/extreme-adhesions-situs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SprayShield™ &#8211; the new product by Covidien</title>
		<link>http://sprayshield.org/clinical-results/sprayshield%e2%84%a2-the-new-product-by-covidien/</link>
		<comments>http://sprayshield.org/clinical-results/sprayshield%e2%84%a2-the-new-product-by-covidien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[clinical results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesions barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprayshield adhesion barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SprayShield adhesions barrier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprayshield.org/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since December 2008 we are using the new SprayShield™ by COVIDIEN. SprayGel™ was modified in some parts, so the resorption was promised to be shorter (5-7 days) than it was with SprayGel™(7-14 days). And the blue colour is not due to methylenblue anymore but a simple colour used frequently in food. More components were modified and I should report later in this board. For now I just wanted to show the clinical results. This is a picture of adhesions on the left pelvic wall: and this after adhesiolysis and here after coverage with SprayShield™: and here the beautiful healed result at 2nd look laparoscopy ONLY 5 days later: For clinical comparison here you can see an image with similar adhesions after adhesiolysis and covered with the SprayGel™ and 7 days later in the 2nd look laparoscopy. One can see that the SprayGel™ is still there and a little tissue reaction (reddish areas with neovascularisation) is shown:   And again for comparison again with SprayShield™, where after only 5 days, SprayShield™ is fully absorbed and the peritoneum is smooth without any reaction:   Actually there seems to be a better and rapid resorption of the Hydrogel and the absence of methylenblue, which was taken from the market some times ago. I think that this result in less foreign body or allergic reactions as in some cases occurred with SprayGel™. We will continue research and if that is the case, we might decrease the time between Surgery and 2nd look laparoscopy to five days, so the time necessary to stay at the hospital will be shorter. Also some complications in regard to infections might decrease with the new product.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; "><span style="font-size: x-small; ">Since December 2008 we are using the new SprayShield&trade; by COVIDIEN. SprayGel&trade; was modified in some parts, so the resorption was promised to be shorter (5-7 days) than it was with SprayGel&trade;(7-14 days). And the blue colour is not due to methylenblue anymore but a simple colour used frequently in food.</span><span style="font-size: x-small; ">&nbsp;</span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; ">More components were modified and I should report later in this board. For now I just wanted to show the clinical results.</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; ">This is a picture of adhesions on the left pelvic wall:</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; "><img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield01.JPG" style="cursor: default; " /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; ">and this after adhesiolysis</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; "><img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield02.JPG" style="cursor: default; " /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; ">and here after coverage with SprayShield&trade;:</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small; "><img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield03.JPG" style="cursor: default; " /></span>and here the beautiful healed result at 2nd look laparoscopy ONLY 5 days later:&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield04.JPG" style="cursor: default; " />For clinical comparison here you can see an image with similar adhesions after adhesiolysis and covered with the SprayGel&trade; and 7 days later in the 2nd look laparoscopy. One can see that the SprayGel&trade; is still there and a little tissue reaction (reddish areas with neovascularisation) is shown:&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/20070813fA.jpg" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/20070813gA.jpg" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;And again for comparison again with SprayShield&trade;, where after only 5 days, SprayShield&trade; is fully absorbed and the peritoneum is smooth without any reaction:&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield03A.JPG" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;<img alt="" src="http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/MessageBoard/SprayShield04A.JPG" style="cursor: default; " />&nbsp;Actually there seems to be a better and rapid resorption of the Hydrogel and the absence of methylenblue, which was taken from the market some times ago. I think that this result in less foreign body or allergic reactions as in some cases occurred with SprayGel&trade;. We will continue research and if that is the case, we might decrease the time between Surgery and 2nd look laparoscopy to five days, so the time necessary to stay at the hospital will be shorter. Also some complications in regard to infections might decrease with the new product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sprayshield.org/clinical-results/sprayshield%e2%84%a2-the-new-product-by-covidien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

